isjesse的部落格

Let\\'s open at the really starting point. I\\'ve ever been a faithful Adobe Captivate mortal. I started exploitation Captivate when it was titled RoboDemo and closely-held by different enterprise titled eHelp. At the time, I was actively superficial for a screencasting implement to place in. I tested diverse unlike ones as well as ViewletBuilder, TurboDemo and Camtasia.

I chose RoboDemo because it had a extreme set of features at a rational charge. Camtasia was at that instance a bit too convoluted for me, with it\\'s striking codec etc. But Camtasia has departed a extended way and next to the new wares of Camtasia Studio 4.0 I\\'ve travel to spine wherever I have to agree on whether to climb to the most recent Captivate 2.0 or electrical switch to Camtasia Studio 4.0 (which cost the same).

Just living in head that this re-evaluation is going to be from my own personal experiences and inevitably.

Recording

The first point I noticed around Camtasia is how easily it collection the eyeshade. It does it so seemlessly. I hardly noticed that it was in the background, signaling my every put somewhere else. Stopping the tape was of late as smooth. Just sound on the \\"Stop\\" fastener and that\\'s it, cassette done. You consequently have a evaluation to prevue what you\\'ve in recent times transcribed. If you\\'re thankful with it, you can recoup it. If not, just withdraw it and initiate a new demo.

The principal dissimilarity relating Camtasia and Captivate when it comes to video recording is what it archives.

With Camtasia, everything on your projection screen (within your chosen area, that is) is recorded. Recording is done in valid juncture. So, if you were to break for for a while to think, the delay would be transcribed as well. But this can be effortlessly emended after that on. Even your mistakes are transcribed. You can e'er hold-up the recording, but if you had to do other than material possession on your information processing system during the pause, continued beside the signaling may not synchronize perfectly.

Captivate, on the some other hand, solitary takes projection screen captures as your eyeshade changes. So, if I had to time interval and come up with for awhile, Captivate won\\'t capture thing. And when you\\'re done, of late clink on \\'stop\\' and Captivate will stack away all the different eyeshade captures into a project. So, alternatively of the one picture file that Camtasia comes up with, Captivate will retrospective all peak seizure as a skid.

So, signal with Captivate and displaying the contrasting slides (which can come through up to 100s) can whip comparatively a bit of juncture and process vigour.

Editing

Maybe I\\'m in recent times so in use to Captivate, but I find writing the screen tape a bit problematical beside Camtasia, specially if I\\'ve made a wrong step somewhere in the cd. The item beside Captivate is that the gnawing animal is captured one by one to the blind itself. So, when editing, I can in actuality shuffle the gnawing animal to wherever I want it to be. I can even cash how the gnawing animal looks similar. So, if I\\'ve clicked on the inaccurate lever in a eyeshade recording, for example, all I have to do is lately cut the rodent to the word-perfect toggle and discover a clicking groan. And the confusion of clicking the untrue fixing would discontinue to be alive.

Editing a written material out of a Camtasia is fairly unproblematic too. Just prize wherever you impoverishment the cut out to kick off and retarding force to wherever you deprivation it to conclusion and sound on the edge tool deity and that\\'s it, choice gone. Unfortunately, on beside it goes the rodent callisthenics. So, depending on the slot you cut out, your viewing audience may see the gnawing animal at one point one ordinal and the end of the surface in other. This may get a bit incomprehensible if you did well-known editing.

Plus, if I were to sound on the false fastener in the recording, I would have to re-record clicking on the well-matched key. And pasting this new copy relating two points in the timeline will not be seemless.

Another point I noticed is to get a perfect \\'cut out\\', you want to keep a snuggled eye on the timeline as the film plays, so you cognize scientifically which fragment to superior. Sometimes you stipulation to keep watch on the pictures much than once, to be unshakable. With Captivate, you vindicatory take the glide that you don\\'t impoverishment and since the gnawer movements is set apart from the visual projection itself, the crusade will loiter seemless.

Adding captions was more easier in Captivate. And individual features that were on hand in Captivate are not enclosed or more inane in Camtasia, for example, count and written material a stress box, count a click box, set book passageway box. But I guess, this is all with the sole purpose key if you poorness to initiate simulations and training as anti to conscionable demos.

The highlight aspect in Captivate, for example, gives you a select of whether you\\'d approaching to accentuate your inspection or the outside region of your action (giving you a colourless out effect). With point to Camtasia\\'s hotspot callout feature, it\\'s a a great deal more than straightforward and too easy publication of Captivate\\'s sound box. Having said that, in recent times suchlike tallying captions, totting up the particular and hotspot callouts into your presentation requires more than effort in Camtasia than it would next to Captivate.

Output format

This is where I presume Camtasia has an upperhand ended Captivate. Camtasia can produce your moving picture in several formats, as well as H.264, Windows Media, AVI, SWF, and FLV. Some of the formats mentioned supports exude which is serviceable if you have a long-run flick. And the video formats makes it smooth for you to upload your cinema to online visual communication hosts such as, GoogleVideo.

Captivate, on the other hand, will single end product the big screen into a Flash aliveness (SWF) which does not arm ooze. But afterwards again, Captivate allows you to end product your slides into Microsoft Word format, which is versatile if you deprivation to make handouts of your demonstration accessible.

Conclusion

Well, all in all, I would have to say that I like Captivate. Mainly because it has features that unite my specialised inevitably. I can , however, read between the lines why Camtasia is so common within the internet mercantilism community. It is a angelic software system and to a number of range more instinctive. And if you don\\'t cognition joint some of your smallish mistakes near your audience as you go along, Camtasia is noticeably easier and more underspent to use.

But if you\\'re resembling me, and you want to make up simulations and homework and you need to have very cartel completed everything on the surface then, you\\'d belike impoverishment to tender Captivate a go.

Having same all that, you have to maintain in consciousness that I simply have a second copy of Captivate. All I want to do is ascent to the current interpretation which disbursement the self as buying a new replica Camtasia. A trade name new Captivate is $599. That, in itself, is plenty to put various of us off - even myself. But for now, looks same I\\'ll stay to Captivate.